| Balancing ethical pros and cons of stem cell derived gametes S Segers, H Mertes, G de Wert, W Dondorp, G Pennings Annals of biomedical engineering 45, 1620-1632, 2017 | 37 | 2017 |
| The path toward ectogenesis: looking beyond the technical challenges S Segers BMC medical ethics 22 (1), 59, 2021 | 36 | 2021 |
| Getting what you desire: the normative significance of genetic relatedness in parent–child relationships S Segers, G Pennings, H Mertes Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (3), 487-495, 2019 | 32 | 2019 |
| Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity? S Segers, H Mertes Bioethics 34 (1), 33-40, 2020 | 25 | 2020 |
| The ethics of ectogenesis‐aided foetal treatment S Segers, G Pennings, H Mertes Bioethics 34 (4), 364-370, 2020 | 21 | 2020 |
| In vitro gametogenesis and reproductive cloning: Can we allow one while banning the other? S Segers, G Pennings, W Dondorp, G De Wert, H Mertes Bioethics 33 (1), 68-75, 2019 | 17 | 2019 |
| In Vitro Gametogenesis and the Creation of ‘Designer Babies’ S Segers, G Pennings, W Dondorp, G de Wert, H Mertes Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3), 499-508, 2019 | 16 | 2019 |
| Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario S Segers, H Mertes, G Pennings, G de Wert, W Dondorp Journal of medical ethics 43 (10), 688-691, 2017 | 15 | 2017 |
| Human embryo research in Belgium: an overview G Pennings, S Segers, S Debrock, B Heindryckx, V Kontozova-Deutsch, ... Fertility and sterility 108 (1), 96-107, 2017 | 14 | 2017 |
| The curious case of “trust” in the light of changing doctor–patient relationships S Segers, H Mertes Bioethics 36 (8), 849-857, 2022 | 12 | 2022 |
| Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative Technologies S Segers, EC Romanis Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 2207-2220, 2022 | 10 | 2022 |
| An ethical exploration of pregnancy related mHealth: does it deliver? S Segers, H Mertes, G Pennings Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (4), 677-685, 2021 | 10 | 2021 |
| Assessing the normative significance of desire satisfaction S Segers, G Pennings, H Mertes Metaphilosophy 53 (4), 475-485, 2022 | 5 | 2022 |
| Enthusiasm, concern and ambivalence in the Belgian public’s attitude towards in-vitro gametogenesis H Mertes, T Goethals, S Segers, M Huysentruyt, G Pennings, V Provoost Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 14, 156-168, 2022 | 5 | 2022 |
| An ethical perspective on ‘Genes versus children’ S Segers, G Pennings Human Reproduction 35 (4), 1006-1007, 2020 | 5 | 2020 |
| We need to talk about disruption in bioethics: a commentary on Rueda, Pugh and Savulescu M De Proost, S Segers Trends in Biotechnology 41 (6), 741-742, 2023 | 4 | 2023 |
| Robot Technology for the Elderly and the Value of Veracity: Disruptive Technology or Reinvigorating Entrenched Principles? S Segers Science and Engineering Ethics 28 (6), 64, 2022 | 4 | 2022 |
| Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen S Segers Journal of medical ethics 47 (3), 169-170, 2021 | 4 | 2021 |
| Ethical reflections on stem cell-derived gametes S Segers, G Pennings, H Mertes Médecine de la Reproduction 19 (4), 298-306, 2017 | 4 | 2017 |
| Heritable genome editing: ethical aspects of a developing domain S Segers Human Reproduction 38 (11), 2055-2061, 2023 | 3 | 2023 |
